Marvin Swartz, MD; Mehul Mankad, MD; Elena Perea, MD

Psychiatry Grand Rounds: Abandon "Goldwater Rule?" Panel on Ethics, Professionalism, Politics

Duke North, Room 2002

About This Event:

During Barry Goldwater's presidential bid, FACT magazine published a survey of US psychiatrists - many of whom opined that Goldwater was mentally ill and unfit to serve as president. This led to much controversy about the role of psychiatrists in making public statements about the mental state of public figures. In 1973 the American Psychiatric Association adopted the so-called 'Goldwater Rule' in its ethical guidelines, indicating it is unethical for a psychiatrist to offer such a professional opinion unless he or she has conducted an examination and has been granted proper authorization for such a statement. This rule has gained new attention in the wake of public concern about the mental state of the current president and advocacy for psychiatrists to offer their opinions about his fitness for duty. This presentation will offer a discussion of the Goldwater Rule in the context of current ethical principles and professionalism.




  • Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences and SOM Grand Rounds

Learn more about DIBS

The Duke Institute for Brain Sciences is a scientific institute with a collaborative spirit and a commitment to education, service and knowledge across disciplines. We encourage creativity, taking risks, sharing ideas and working together.


Sign up to receive email updates about DIBS news, events and more.